It seems to be Minnesota day here at This Sporting Life. Earlier we brought you a look at the current state of fan affairs in the MLS, with our look at the reaction to the Minnesota Vikings’ and San Jose Earthquakes’ respective stadium deals.
After a bit more digging, it seems like this Vikings stadium deal–which, it should be pointed out, is yet to be approved by the Minnesota House, Senate, or the City Council of Minneapolis–could have a more direct effect on MLS and Sporting Kansas City.
Buried in the term sheet for the stadium plan announced today is this gem:
The Vikings have exclusive rights to bring Major League Soccer to the new stadium within five years of its opening, and the team could play there without paying additional rent. “The team intends to actively evaluate pursuing an MLS franchise,” the term sheet says.
The Twin Cities have been rumored in the past to be interested in acquiring a MLS franchise, but this is the most concrete evidence thus far. And while other cities are mentioned as possible expansion possibilities–NYC, St Louis, San Diego, Atlanta, Charlotte–Minnesota has an established owner (Vikings’ owner Zygi Wilf) firmly in place and may soon have a sparkling new stadium.
It’s interesting that such a statement would be included in the stadium’s term sheet. But, cities and local governments have wised up to the grossly unfair stadium deals of the past, and many think doling out millions of dollars for 8 home football games a year is a poor investment. The additional tenant would give stadium proponents a little more political clout (or, if you’re cynical, the Wilfs have no intention of bringing a MLS team and are posturing in an effort to improve the odds of having a football stadium built while “actively evaluating pursuing” a MLS franchise).
Now what a team in Minneapolis would mean for MLS is not exactly clear. First of all, the franchise’s games would be played in a hulking 60,000+ seat stadium. Second of all, there seems to be a saturation of the market as the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro already has franchises in all four major sports.
Despite that, count us as supporters of the idea. If it came to fruition, the team would have an established owner in Zygi Wilf, a downtown stadium with several light rail stops within walking distance of the stadium, in a market that is rapidly growing (The MPLS-St. Paul metro has 3.3 million people, and is the 16th largest market in the country). The large football stadium isn’t ideal, but for a city that prides itself as being the Portland of the Midwest, the stadium seems to be workable.
And best of all, this gives us the regional rivalry we’ve been clamoring for. St. Louis doesn’t seem like it’s going to get an ownership group in place anytime soon. Minneapolis would provide the proximity needed to start a true regional rivalry, something that due to our geography, SKC is lacking.
And for those wondering, yes, there will be a roof on the stadium for the inevitable shift to the winter schedule.
We’ll keep you posted as the Minnesota stadium debate continues.




